This compound carries a complex name, and behind it stands a unique molecular structure. Built around a quinoline core, this molecule features a chlorine atom at the 7-position, an ethenyl linker, and two bulky aryl groups with one of them harboring a hydroxy-isopropyl side chain. The formula stacks up as C28H26ClNO2, giving a detailed picture to anyone who’s worked in chemical development or on the bench in an analytical lab. Its molecular weight nearly tips 443.97 g/mol, which sets it in the midweight range for specialty organic chemicals.
You won’t find this compound as a household item. Everything about it, from the shape of its crystals to the way it behaves at room temperature, tells a story about fine synthetic chemistry. In practice, (S)-1-(3-(2-(7-Chloro-2-Quinolinyl)Ethenyl)Phenyl)-3-(2-(1-Hydroxy-1-Methylethyl)-Phenyl)Propanol appears as a near-white or light yellow solid, with the consistency ranging from fine powder to small flaky crystals. Ambient air and humidity do not usually cause rapid breakdown, which makes storage manageable if the material is sealed in a cool, dry space. Its density climbs just above 1.2 g/cm³, and the flakes respond quickly to heat, giving way to a melting point in the range of 130–135°C. Solubility follows the usual trends for high-molecular-weight organics: moderate in ethanol and methanol, sparing in water, but decent in ether and nonpolar solvents. This has real implications for handling in chemical synthesis or formulation work, where solvent choice shapes the outcome—a lesson any chemist learns fast.
A closer look at its structure reveals a fusion of aromatic energy and polar functionality. That means rigidity in the quinoline ring, extended pi-conjugation through the ethenyl bridge, and an asymmetric center at the terminal hydroxy-propanol group. This chiral center creates an (S)-enantiomer, which often influences biological interactions—a detail scientists watch carefully, because stereochemistry can modify everything from physical packing in solids to receptor binding in therapeutic applications. With such features, the material often arrives as a purified substance, free from extensive isomeric mixtures. Handling and packaging go together with precise analytical data: melting point, NMR, IR, elemental analysis, and sometimes chiral HPLC for confirmation of enantiomeric purity.
Every industrial chemical gains an identity under global trade. HS code allocation serves a vital function here, keeping international labeling and customs processes in order. For a compound like this, the code generally falls under those assigned to organic chemicals (typically 2933.x), covering heterocyclic compounds with nitrogen hetero-atoms. Anyone shipping, importing, or even labeling raw materials for R&D gets familiar with this system. This structure not only helps with traceability but satisfies compliance with standards set by national and international regulatory agencies.
Most suppliers deliver this compound as a dry powder or as slightly larger flakes. Sometimes, researchers or manufacturers request pre-prepared solutions for ease of use or to minimize inhalation risks. In the lab, I’ve always found the powdered form easier to weigh and dissolve, especially when aiming for small-scale reactions or high-purity analytical work. For industrial scale-up, handling convenience and dust suppression matter, and sometimes the ‘pearls’ or larger solid granules limit airborne particles. Each form brings logistical questions: Does the powder cake up over time? Do the flakes melt together in hot climates? Questions like these get answered through experience, not just datasheets.
No modern practice overlooks safety. A chemical with this profile generally falls into the “harmful” or “hazardous” categories according to GHS standards—largely because of the presence of both aromatic amines and a quinoline skeleton, which can carry toxicity or present allergy risks. Accidental ingestion or skin contact shouldn’t be taken lightly. Labs and manufacturing floors rely on safety data sheets (SDS) for everything: recommended personal protective equipment, storage conditions, fire-fighting measures, and emergency first aid. Chemical workers learn how to store these compounds away from incompatible oxidizers and acids, not out of fear, but out of well-learned respect for reactivity. Understanding the precise hazards—like environmental toxicity to aquatic organisms or potential for respiratory irritation—helps minimize harm and fosters a culture of precaution.
If you ask someone who works in pharmaceutical development, they might notice that molecules like this serve as intermediates or active ingredients in experimental therapeutic agents. The mix of planar aromatic rings and specific stereochemistry offers routes to new molecular scaffolds. Analytical chemists value these features for their specificity in reactions, and material scientists look for thermal or optical properties in advanced applications. But practical use brings challenges: sourcing raw materials at purity and scale, ensuring quality over time, managing waste safely. My work has sometimes meant balancing those competing demands, negotiating with suppliers, using archived batch records to trace composition, or troubleshooting alongside colleagues in quality control.
Synthesizing such a compound calls for building blocks like 7-chloroquinoline derivatives, substituted phenylethylenes, and functionalized phenols. Each precursor brings its own fingerprint and set of handling instructions, but care at this earliest stage determines downstream purity and performance. Chemical manufacturing often demands process optimization—reaction times tuned, solvents recycled, byproducts monitored—so that cost and environmental impact stay manageable. Later, the finished product, whether delivered to labs in gram-scale bottles or to plant floors in multi-kilogram drums, finds its way into broader chemical syntheses, bioassays, or experimental drug platforms.
Anyone who has worked in chemical handling or R&D knows the persistent issue of balancing progress with safety and sustainability. This means not just following the rules, but engaging with the science. Reducing environmental harm starts with containment, controlled waste disposal, and better solvent recycling. Long-term, many in the industry push toward safer analogs or green synthesis techniques. For a compound like (S)-1-(3-(2-(7-Chloro-2-Quinolinyl)Ethenyl)Phenyl)-3-(2-(1-Hydroxy-1-Methylethyl)-Phenyl)Propanol, real progress often comes from those who tinker with the process, chase down improved precursors, and adapt to new safety standards as more toxicity data arrives. Having seen the difference new methods make—limiting hazardous byproducts, protecting staff—it’s clear that innovation in chemical management pays off well beyond the laboratory door.