A look back through the decades of chemical research, especially throughout the twentieth century, reveals a fascinating journey in the understanding and use of chiral diamines. As laboratories worldwide explored new frontiers in organic synthesis, (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate emerged as a building block that helped drive asymmetric synthesis forward. Early breakthroughs in chiral catalysis and the search for more efficient and selective ligands paved the way, with laboratories in Europe and Asia exchanging findings throughout the postwar period. Researchers tested and refined enantiopure diamines not as academic curiosities but as solutions to real-world problems: cleaner production processes, safer chiral drugs, and unparalleled consistency in industrial synthesis. Chemists refining these diamines learned quickly that stereochemistry lies at the core of pharmaceutical efficacy and safety, creating pressure to identify and stabilize specific enantiomers on a large scale. The introduction of L-tartrate as a resolving agent set a new standard, while industrial producers embraced this compound due to its steady supply, straightforward handling, and repeatable results. These advantages ensured it a lasting position in the toolbox of fine chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturing.
In daily practice, (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate often serves as a solid, white to off-white crystalline powder that delivers high chiral purity and keeps batch-to-batch consistency under tight control. For anyone guiding custom synthesis or scale-up of pharmaceutical intermediates, reliable performance in resolving racemates and acting as a chiral auxiliary remains invaluable. Labs that stress the importance of reproducibility appreciate suppliers who guarantee enantiomeric excess and minimal contamination. The material sees standard use in asymmetric hydrogenation, an area key to affordable medicines and high-value specialty chemicals. The tartaric acid counterion, sourced from nature, adds another layer of environmental appeal for companies chasing greener credentials in process development.
From hands-on experience in bench chemistry, one learns very quickly to respect physical properties. This compound, with a molecular weight of roughly 294.3 g/mol (in the salt form), shows good solubility in water and alcohols, though sparingly soluble in nonpolar solvents. Solid state purity often stays above 98%, while anhydrous storage helps preserve performance in air. A melting point in the range of 180-200°C usually points to high quality and minimal degradation. Its amine groups react readily, but the cyclic backbone gives resilience against many environmental stresses common in both pilot plant and warehouse settings. Knowledge of these traits influences not just the way the compound is handled, but the choice of storage and transportation, especially when heat, moisture, or light might affect stability.
Every bottle shipped from a reputable supplier comes labeled with clear chemical names, batch numbers, and technical specs: assay value, trace impurity limits, moisture content, and recommended storage conditions. For some projects, especially those tied to upcoming clinical filings or regulated sectors, Certificate of Analysis documents take center stage. Full traceability, from raw material to finished lot, helps chemists defend their choices when submitting to auditors or regulatory agencies. Country-of-origin labeling, GMP status, and indications of chiral purity (enantiomeric excess, optical rotation) are more than compliance—they act as signals of product integrity that build trust and ease downstream troubleshooting.
Drawing on established prep methods, many routes for (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine rely on hydrogenation of o-phenylenediamine or catalytic reduction of substituted cyclohexanones, followed by salt formation with naturally derived L-tartaric acid. Key steps often involve delicate temperature and pH control, prompting investment in continuous process monitoring. Once isolated, the diamine gets combined with L-tartaric acid in aqueous ethanol, yielding the highly crystalline L-tartrate salt. Washing and recrystallization trim away side-products, leaving high-purity batches suitable for immediate use. Over several years of troubleshooting bench-scale processes, it became clear that tweaking solvent choice or cooling rate can mean the difference between single crystals and impure slush. Documentation of every adjustment helps protect future scale-ups from batch-to-batch variability.
Chemists routinely pick (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate to introduce chirality during asymmetric hydrogenation, where its enantiopure backbone steers metal catalysts toward preferred product outcomes. It reacts easily with acyl chlorides, isocyanates, or aldehydes to create a range of chiral auxiliaries. Further functionalization—acylation, alkylation, carbamoylation—enables bespoke ligands for pharmaceutical and agrochemical synthesis. Adjustment of the diamine's protective groups tailors it to more specialized tasks, such as in the formation of chiral Schiff bases. Every tweak to the parent structure opens new doors for stereoselectivity, and exploring those modifications continues to generate patents and high-impact papers. This constant chemical tinkering demonstrates the kind of adaptable thinking needed in an industry that often demands one-of-a-kind solutions.
Depending on supplier or catalog, this compound sometimes appears under names like (R,R)-1,2-Diaminocyclohexane L-tartrate, DACH L-tartrate, or Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine, trans-(+)-, L-tartrate salt. Chemists searching through procurement lists encounter abbreviations like (R,R)-CHDA or (R,R)-DACH-L-tartrate, particularly in the context of chiral ligand packages and asymmetric reagent kits. Keeping track of synonyms can prevent costly misorders, especially in organizations juggling multiple projects with similar-sounding intermediates. Training new team members to always cross-reference CAS numbers or supplier-specific codes keeps projects on track and avoids delayed timelines.
Every workplace must take safety seriously, especially when handling amines and tartrate salts. Skin or eye contact breed irritation, and inhalation risks push many labs to favor glove boxes or ventilated enclosures. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) recommend gloves, goggles, and careful attention to spill management. Long-term inhalation or repeated exposure may prompt additional health surveillance if production or lab activities become routine. Environmental standards demand careful neutralization and disposal of unused stock or waste, often via incineration or dilution under controlled conditions. Regular in-house safety audits and hazard training sessions help build a culture of vigilance, which in turn lowers incident rates and reassures downstream customers about product handling all the way through to finished pharmaceuticals.
The real value of (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate shows up in action, particularly in the pharma and agrochemical worlds. Asymmetric hydrogenation, a lion’s share of chiral drug production, relies on diamine ligands to tilt reactions toward one enantiomer, sharpening purity and therapeutic effect of APIs. Specialty polymers and advanced materials incorporate chirality for electronics, sensors, and coatings. Catalysis research mines this compound’s structure for new ligand frameworks aimed at more selective, greener reactions. Development teams in biopharma chase small-molecule APIs with lower environmental impact, drawn by both the proven reactivity and renewable credentials of the L-tartrate counterion. Process scale-up, API intermediate manufacture, and even fine chemical custom synthesis regularly draw upon this diamine’s reliability.
Research circles continue to toss up creative challenges, and (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate meets many of them. Academic teams dissect reaction mechanisms, using this diamine to probe subtle influences on catalysis and stereoselectivity. Industrial R&D adapts the backbone for new ligands, targeting next-generation processes that save time, cut costs, and limit waste. Recent studies tap into computational chemistry, mapping how the amine’s precise structure nudges metal centers to induce chirality. Global efforts to expand the toolkit of enantioselective reactions make use of this compound, with published papers highlighting how process tweaks—solvent changes, altered metal loadings, or swapped counterions—can dramatically boost selectivity. In the journey from bench to plant, learning from each failed batch sharpens future protocols, and this diamine plays a recurring role in those iterative improvements.
Regular safety assessments log this compound as low to moderate on acute toxicity scales, but no researcher ignores the risk of amine sensitization or cumulative exposure. Animal models and cell lines help quantify chronic impacts, and so far, no high-profile toxicity red flags have rocked its use. Human contact—via inhalation or ingestion—remains tightly controlled in regulated facilities, and in pharma, all traces must fade before APIs reach the consumer. Toxicologists keep a close eye on metabolites and breakdown products, while environmental chemists measure how tartrate salts disperse or persist in waste streams. Corporate responsibility programs emphasize worker protection and responsible stewardship, reinforcing the value of transparent, regular reporting in line with global safety norms.
Shifting landscapes in green chemistry and biopharma continue to stoke demand for sustainable, chiral building blocks. (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate stands as a versatile candidate: affordable, well-characterized, and backed by a history of successful industrial scaling. Future directions point to even tighter process controls, with digital batch tracking, predictive purity analytics, and leaner solvent and energy footprints. Researchers working to invent cleaner hydrogenation methods see promise in new ligand variants that cut catalyst loading or eliminate toxic metals altogether. Global regulatory bodies now ask for robust, reproducible synthetic routes, and this compound, with its clear supply chain and low environmental burden, helps producers tick all those boxes. Ongoing collaborations between academia and industry suggest a bright future, marked by deeper understanding of asymmetric catalysis and the linked promise of safer, more affordable medicines and materials for everyone.
Labs have always caught my eye, not just for the science but for how tiny tweaks can steer bigger changes. (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate stands out as a building block in organic chemistry. This compound, though invisible in daily life, takes center stage in the development of certain pharmaceuticals and specialty materials. Chemists favor it thanks to its rigid, chiral nature—fancy wording for a molecular structure that bends light and shapes space in a specific way. These molecules can't be flipped like a pancake; their handedness sets a template for all the molecules downstream.
I’ve seen researchers light up at the chance to solve a synthesis puzzle, and this compound keeps showing up in those efforts. It steps into the spotlight in the process of making platinum-based chemotherapy drugs, particularly oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin owes part of its punch to cancer cells to this exact diamine, tightly bound to a metal ion. By controlling the way the diamine arranges itself around platinum, scientists produce a drug that attacks tumors differently from earlier treatments. Hospitals in many countries rely on oxaliplatin as a go-to therapy for colon cancer. Without this diamine, the entire synthesis would run into problems; yields drop, and purity takes a hit.
Not every scientist works in disease research. Some look for ways to make reactions leaner and greener. Chiral diamines, and this one in particular, often turn up in the world of asymmetric catalysis. Catalysts built from such molecules steer chemical reactions toward a single desirable mirror-image product. That selectivity matters for everything from fine chemicals in scents and flavors to advanced materials in electronics.
As someone who spent nights troubleshooting failed reactions, I can say the frustration of getting a mix of products is real. Using (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate often solves that problem, channeling the energy so that only the right stuff forms. Lesser-known corners of the industry, including the creation of special ligands or additives, also rely on this compound for its predictability.
Nothing shatters trust in a lab quite like an impurity in the batch. Impurities can trip up clinical trials or make scaled-up manufacturing a headache. I’ve seen procurement teams double-check paperwork and certificates, making absolutely sure that their (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate hits the right optical rotation and passes every analytical test. Strict audits and supply chain transparency matter because any shortcut could ripple through to people who count on these drugs.
Quality pharmaceuticals should reach everyone who needs them. Sourcing ingredients like this diamine from reliable suppliers prevents counterfeit products. Cost remains a challenge, especially since making “chiral” substances calls for labor-intensive steps or specialized equipment. Innovative green chemistry methods—less waste, smarter solvents, and biocatalysts—can lighten the environmental load while keeping supply steady.
Investing in new ways to synthesize critical compounds like (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate doesn’t just benefit big pharma or small startups. At the end of the line, patients, researchers, and everyday consumers all have a stake in these behind-the-scenes improvements.
Chemistry can seem full of intimidating names, and (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate definitely sounds like something from an advanced textbook. For researchers, students, or anyone working on synthesis protocols, one question keeps cropping up — how does this compound behave in water and other common solvents? Solubility might sound like details for the lab, but its practical effects reach much further. Every failed reaction, unexpected crystal, or clogged filter in a pharmaceutical lab can trace its roots back to how well or poorly a compound dissolves.
(1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate plays an important role in asymmetric synthesis and chiral resolution. This salt comes from combining a chiral diamine with L-tartaric acid. In practice, many protocols use this compound for its ability to separate racemic mixtures and produce high-purity intermediates. Getting reliable, reproducible results ties closely to solubility. If a chemist expects this compound to dissolve like sugar in water, reality can throw a curveball.
Lab hands who’ve tried washing this salt into acetone or ether find it clumps, leaving undissolved powder behind. Water, on the other hand, often works better. Most published work and supplier sheets agree: it shows significant solubility in water, with values around 100 mg/mL or more at room temperature. The presence of both amine and carboxylate groups encourages favorable hydrogen bonding, allowing more molecules of the salt to slip into solution. Ethanol and methanol might also dissolve reasonable amounts, but solvents like hexane don’t help.
Why does this matter for outcomes? Dissolution speed affects yield. For crystallization, growth habits change when the solution’s too dilute or too concentrated. Suppose someone scales up a reaction, swaps water for something less polar, and then wonders why nothing happens. That’s a simple error, yet it costs time and resources. I’ve seen teams lose hours thinking through new work-ups, only to scrap a whole batch because a key intermediate wouldn't dissolve as expected.
Solubility also drives safety. Imagine trying to separate a salt that never left the bottom of a flask. Frustration leads some to overheat or over-stir, risking spills, glass breakages, or ruined product. These are not rare events — many working chemists have at least one “I tried everything and nothing dissolved” story from their early career. Checking actual solubility figures before launching a run means making safer, smarter choices.
According to data from producer catalogs and chemical registries, (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate dissolves readily in water, reaching clear solutions at concentrations above 10% w/v in some cases. Why such numbers? The combined influence of ionic and hydrogen bonding drives up solubility in polar solvents. The salt crystal breaks apart, surrounded by water or alcohol molecules, though less so in less polar solvents.
Struggling with solid sticking to the flask? Switching to water or a water-alcohol mix often skyrockets solubility. Slow dissolution can sometimes be helped with gentle warming, but overheating ruins the product. Pro tip from lived lab experience: measure carefully before dumping in solvent, and remember that scale-up might change the game. Checking a supplier’s detailed product sheet or consulting CRC solubility tables before planning a run prevents headaches later.
Those who treat solubility like an afterthought discover quickly how it shapes every step from synthesis to purification. Learning early and staying mindful saves resources and keeps chemists off the list of “it won’t dissolve” stories.
Someone asked about the best way to store (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate, a compound used in the synthesis of certain pharmaceuticals and catalysts. I’ve seen plenty of people brush off storage details, figuring a jar on a shelf will do. Yet, anyone who’s prepped a sensitive reagent knows a slip-up here can mean ruined samples or, worse, safety headaches that linger for months.
Working in academic and contract labs, I’ve watched powders cake, crystals go dark, or labels peel off and cause confusion. Many forget that the wrong environment invites moisture, degradation, and contamination. When I handled diamines or tartrates, any splash of humidity could turn a dry, white powder into a sticky mess. Even a few degrees hotter in the storeroom, and you might find clumps or changes in the smell of your reagent.
(1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate runs into these same risks. This salt, like most organic acids and amines, can soak up water from the air. In my own benchwork, if the crystals changed appearance, purity tests and NMR scans would show unwanted peaks, ruining reaction outcomes. That meant headaches at best, starting over at worst.
A dry, cool, well-labeled container in a dedicated chemical storage area helps. Sealing the bottle tightly after use not only keeps the air out but also guards against spills or other reagents sneaking in. I’ve seen labs where packs of desiccant live alongside the bottles, catching drops of water that slip past. Avoiding direct sunlight is another smart idea; window sills look convenient, but heat and UV light can wreck sensitive chemicals over time.
Some users keep these reagents in sealed bags or ampules, using argon or nitrogen to blanket the crystals after every weigh-out. That feels fancy in an undergraduate teaching lab, but in specialty research, it's sometimes mandatory. At the very least, sticking with tightly-capped bottles, out of reach of direct sun, makes for a habit that saves a lot of time and money.
In one of my old labs, someone once left an unsealed tub out over a holiday weekend. The material clumped and failed every check. That single mistake meant ordering a fresh batch, recalibrating some instruments, and rescheduling the run, with lost time and hundreds of dollars in wasted material. For teaching or industry, where chemicals often get shared and handed off, simple labeling—name, date opened, any special drying needs—truly pays off.
Reputable chemical suppliers offer storage conditions right on their data sheets. Looking these up before unsealing the bottle saves grief later. Many recommend temperatures below 25°C and dry, airtight storage, mirroring what experience has shown. Lab practice and official guidance align for a reason—it’s about keeping the material pure and the people handling it safe.
Everyone in a lab, whether it’s research, education, or production, plays a part in keeping chemicals in shape. From tightening the lid to filing a note in the logbook, small steps keep (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate ready for action, not ruined before its time.
A lot of people assume that purity is just a technical detail, something left for folks in white coats behind laboratory doors. The reality is that purity specification shapes real outcomes. Let’s say you pick up a bag of a chemical for farming, medicine, food, or electronics. In each of those fields, purity means something different, but the outcome ends up right on your plate, in your medicines, or ticking away in your phone.
Most products carry a purity value as a percentage. For example, a bag labeled 99.5% pure means that out of every hundred grams, only half a gram isn’t the main ingredient. The rest could be water, dust, other chemicals, or just about anything allowed by the production process or raw material sources. Labs usually measure purity using straightforward tools—chromatography, titration, infrared spectroscopy—methods that have been around for decades and keep getting more precise.
Think about medicines. Even a minuscule amount of impurity might trigger allergic reactions or reduce treatment success. In farming, impurities mean fewer nutrients for crops or even unintended poisoning of the soil. Food manufacturers who overlook purity pay the price in recalls, fines, and sometimes lawsuits. Errors pile up at the consumer level, too. A story from my own family: an uncle of mine, a small-scale soap maker, once grabbed what he thought was a clean ingredient. Months later, after shifting suppliers to save a few bucks, his customers started complaining about rashes. Purity had dropped just one percent. That’s all it took.
Regulators keep an eye on purity, too. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration monitors product claims with surprise inspections. Food code books run hundreds of pages, all to keep cheap fillers or dangerous contaminants out of the supply chain. In Europe and much of Asia, agencies demand paperwork tracking every step from sourcing to packaging. No surprise that suppliers winning customer loyalty usually have third-party lab results to back their claims.
Buyers often request certificates of analysis for every shipment, not just a single sample. One batch can vary wildly from the next, so the paperwork isn't just about transparency—it’s about traceability. A good certificate explains more than the headline number. It may show heavy metals, moisture content, or breakdown products, so buyers spot issues before their customers notice.
Just having a percentage isn’t enough. Shady businesses might bump up the number by measuring in ways that hide residues. Some impurities won’t show up in the tests suppliers use. Genuine sellers work with accredited labs and allow random audits.
If there’s one fix that works, it’s keeping the conversation real. Don’t accept vague claims. Ask for details, the actual test method, and lab credentials. Review results for each shipment, not just one. Suppliers worth trust don’t hesitate to share this information. Only then do you really know what goes into the product—and into our lives.
A lot of professionals in pharmaceuticals and specialty chemicals know the pain of tracking down reliable bulk sources for rare chiral intermediates. (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate is a perfect example. This compound, prized for its enantiomeric purity, steps up in asymmetric synthesis and in catalysts for pharma projects that demand precision. It's not simply about price or lead time; it's about trust in quality, consistency, and supplier transparency.
Most chemical suppliers flash product listings online, often boasting multi-kilogram inventory. But experience tells me not every supplier who accepts a bulk order can guarantee the same lot meets strict quality specifications every time. A handful of global distributors carry it, but the journey from small-scale lab reagent to true bulk scale isn't straightforward. You reach out to three sources, and at least one sends back an offer that's actually a custom synthesis quote. Sometimes, companies present "bulk" as 100 grams, far from what a small manufacturing plant requires.
From what I've seen, the biggest challenge in sourcing (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate isn’t inventory, but batch-to-batch consistency. High performance in analytical tests like chiral HPLC is make-or-break. Inconsistent purity levels spell trouble for process reproducibility. I remember a situation where a colleague at a mid-sized biotech swapped suppliers to cut costs. Unexpected shifts in chiral purity and residual solvents triggered regulatory headaches and forced a recall of a development batch.
Reliable companies like TCI, Sigma-Aldrich, and some large Asian chemical makers periodically stock this compound in kilo packs. Their technical documentation often holds up to regulatory review. Buyers with volume needs beyond five kilos still end up discussing custom manufacture, long lead times, and sometimes even getting tied into annual contracts to have guaranteed supply. Smaller distributors normally buy in drums from Asia and repackage locally. This works, but creates extra links in the chain—another chance for storage or contamination issues.
Many chemists see enantiomeric purity as more than a technical detail. A compound like (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate lands in the synthesis of API building blocks where a misstep, even by a fraction of a percent, impacts both cost structure and the ability to win regulatory approval. Global demand isn’t astronomical, but the few buyers who care about scale absolutely require pure and reliable supply. From personal experience working at a start-up, ordering from an unknown broker once led to months of email ping-pong just to sort out a certificate of analysis that matched the delivered product.
I’ve found that a straightforward long-term supply contract with documented quality benchmarks goes further than chasing spot prices for bulk. Openly communicating with suppliers about expected annual volumes and tolerances on purity pays off, both in service and in peace of mind. Site visits to Asian production plants, even virtual, can clear many questions fast and sort real manufacturers from trading resellers. More buyers also request third-party audits or batch retention samples for future re-testing. Regulators in Europe and North America ask for audit trails, so maintaining a paper chain for each batch—COA, MSDS, chain of custody—saves frustration down the line.
Those buying (1R,2R)-(+)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diamine L-tartrate in volume should skip the urge to default to the cheapest per-kilo offer. Instead, tap into a real conversation with established suppliers, clarify what “bulk” means contractually, and confirm capabilities through technical diligence. If the source can’t provide a transparent and responsive partnership, that's a red flag, even if the lead time looks good on paper. The best chemical supply deals aren’t won with speed—they’re secured through expertise, good records, and clear quality standards.
Providing high-quality chemical products and logistics solutions for global trade partners.
